Skip to Main Content

Westlaw Database Guide

Research Tips and Database Guide

Key parts of court opinions on Westlaw:

  • Header information:
    • Case name
    • Issuing court
    • Opinion / decision date
    • Legal Citation (and Parallel citations)
  • Synopsis
  • Headnotes
  • Status (red/yellow flags)

Court Opinions : Header Information

  • Case name
  • Issuing court
  • Issuing date
  • Legal citation (and Parallel citations )

Westlaw Miranda v Arizona screen shot of top

Synopsis

The Synopsis is a great place to get a summary and overview of the case and opinion.  The synopsis usually includes:

  • Background: Brief description of the history of the case:
    • What courts had rendered opinions previously;
    • Their brief finding;
    • Whether a subsequent court had affirmed or reversed lower court;
    • Whether it was appealed or sent back to a lower court ("remand") for further consideration.
  • Holdings:
    • Summarizes current court's decision
    • Indicates results of decision
      • Affirmed - agree with lower court decision
      • Reversed - overturn lower court decision
      • Remanded - sent back to lower court for further consideration
  • Lists who dissented.

 

Example: Synopsis from Miranda v. Arizona

Criminal prosecutions. {The synopsis starts with a history of the case, listing each court and summarizing their decisions.} The Supreme Court, Mr. Chief Justice Warren, held that statements obtained from defendants during incommunicado interrogation in police-dominated atmosphere, without full warning of constitutional rights, were inadmissible as having been obtained in violation of Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
Judgments in first three cases reversed and judgment in fourth case affirmed.
Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White dissented; Mr. Justice Clark dissented in

Headnotes

Headnotes are summaries of specific points of law addressed in a particular case, drafted by Westlaw Attorney Editors. This links relevant to a legal topic cases even where they use uncommon/atypical language (which may not be retrieved by searching).